yesterday I was to DJ pon Aloha Beach, as far as previous week I didn't spin I thought I am to DJ at 6 am SLT while actually I am at 5 am. so I was about 30 mins late. well, I spinned my set despite of connexion troubles. immediately after the end of spinning I got to log off so i had no time to change group tag and can u imagine my wonder when I log in and found that I ain't DJ of Aloha Beach anymore. lol.
I spoke to ikapono.catnap the owner of Aloha Beach and asked her if she is serious, i.e. is she going to eject me who spent more than a year pon the club just cause one case? ika chan offered me to take time out for a while. LOL. and I told her that if I go I go and never come back cause I ain't a plain staff which can be ejected and then can becalled again.
u probably wanna some moral? there is no moral pon this story. it's just a story of real life which is continued by SL I mean SL is continuation of RL actually. it is good that case like this happened in SL actually but not in RL.
2013年11月13日水曜日
2013年11月1日金曜日
some general notes on left wing and right wing
I was DJing pon Java beach club and we discussed just founded Kogyaru Riot and its idea and step by step conversation turned to the discussion of left and right ideas and differences between them.
Actually I have never thought that people's mind could be so tangled. when a guy told me "communism, fascism = left wing" I tried to explain him that it's a completely wrong view cause it contradicts to basic definitions but he didn't paid attention to my explanation and continued to repeat his mantra: marxists and fascist r leftists, leftists r against freedom. LOL!!! At that moment I decided to write something on true meaning of left and right.
Well, first I am to note that any good useful definition should envelop in same direction as etymology of a described phenomenon, should reflect the etymology, should count etymology, should take into consideration the origin of described phenomenon.
In the case of left wing and right wing we should turn to their root to French Revolution epoch when these two political trends appeared first. Leftists were supporters of changes (i.e. supporters of much freedom for individuals) while rightists were supporter of status quo (i.e. against positive changes).
And thus we can see that leftists are those who r for more freedoms (different freedoms, because there r no economic freedoms without so called politic freedoms and vice versa).
Leftists r against oppression of a human by any groups. And leftists r suspicious of any state.
This is the definition of true left as it was from the very beginning.
Right wing on contrary is against many individual freedoms but instead of it provides very interesting freedom: freedom from responsibility. Rightists think a human is a human and has a certain value as far as he/she is a member of certain group or a corpo.
Drainage divide between two trends is their view on state and relationship between state and a certain human being: leftists r suspicious of any state while right wing tend to worships state and state alike structures.
Of course both trend consist of very different movements but their general difference is their point of view on state and group/corpo oppression of individual freedom.
But stop how it could be that many people of different countries state the following: "rights r for more freedom, lefts r for more regulation"?
The root of this semantic controversy is not Soviet commies as many libertarian socialists think the root is much deeper.
Semantic catastrophe of left movement began from Marx.
Marx and his followers made two bad things (actually they made more but these two r most important now):
1) they artificially narrowed left movement to working class so all other social groups were actually thrown outside the left movement.
2) they too much focused their attention on economic questions, narrowed human activity by economics.
And it lead to the following bad things:
1) many people of left practice but those who r against Marxism in order to distinguish themselves from Marxists don't call themselves leftists. having learned it we r to be careful and don't pay much attention to name of certain groups cause names can be emotional random and illogical but we r to pay attention to practice of certain group (for instance Conservatives of Canada r supposed to be right but actually they r a kind of libertarian socialists).
2) As far as Marx's main point was economics people accepted this idea and usually use economics as base of classification of different types of politic systems ignoring other aspects of life and ignoring original general idea of left movement: more freedom in all aspects not just in economics.
As I said above economic freedom and political freedom r related but they don't correlate directly and immediately: there could be societies with much economic freedoms and little politic freedom: Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, Spain of Franco, Chili of Pinochet, South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong.
A libertarian being asked of an ideal type of society would most probably tell us about completely free market. But market without any restriction of non economic nature will obligatory converse into an oligarchy: what will keep big corporation from destroying small firms? What will keep managements of big corporations from set up their own state their own dictatorship? Who will make corporation support fundamental science?
Actually libertarians r just another kind of bolschevik or commies.
And Marxism and related movements obviously ain't left cause dictatorship can't be combined with left practice. This is general objection against Marxism. Society is a layers cake, it can't consist of solely class and the more caless the more groups there r in a certain society the less abrasive it is.
Marxists state that they gonna create a completely just society where all needs of all people will be provided but immediately started to restrict human needs cause different people have different desires and it is impossible to provide all in the condition of plan economics but as far as they want to build a just society they r to provide all needs so it is much more simple to restrict desires, to state that certain desires r illegal, r unjust: u could not have ur own plane or ur own island ur even could not have ur own bike or net-book cause it's illegal desire... finally they come to the state where only the very basic needs r allowed. But restriction of human desire is impossible without serious oppression of freedom; that's why actually all Marxists projects always end like Polpotism.
From a point of view of a certain human being it doesn't matter who and for which goal concretely oppress people: nazi for pure race, commi for their communism or religious conservators - all they r just different types of right wing scum.
And that's why true leftist r anti-marxist leftist.
Actually I have never thought that people's mind could be so tangled. when a guy told me "communism, fascism = left wing" I tried to explain him that it's a completely wrong view cause it contradicts to basic definitions but he didn't paid attention to my explanation and continued to repeat his mantra: marxists and fascist r leftists, leftists r against freedom. LOL!!! At that moment I decided to write something on true meaning of left and right.
Well, first I am to note that any good useful definition should envelop in same direction as etymology of a described phenomenon, should reflect the etymology, should count etymology, should take into consideration the origin of described phenomenon.
In the case of left wing and right wing we should turn to their root to French Revolution epoch when these two political trends appeared first. Leftists were supporters of changes (i.e. supporters of much freedom for individuals) while rightists were supporter of status quo (i.e. against positive changes).
And thus we can see that leftists are those who r for more freedoms (different freedoms, because there r no economic freedoms without so called politic freedoms and vice versa).
Leftists r against oppression of a human by any groups. And leftists r suspicious of any state.
This is the definition of true left as it was from the very beginning.
Right wing on contrary is against many individual freedoms but instead of it provides very interesting freedom: freedom from responsibility. Rightists think a human is a human and has a certain value as far as he/she is a member of certain group or a corpo.
Drainage divide between two trends is their view on state and relationship between state and a certain human being: leftists r suspicious of any state while right wing tend to worships state and state alike structures.
Of course both trend consist of very different movements but their general difference is their point of view on state and group/corpo oppression of individual freedom.
But stop how it could be that many people of different countries state the following: "rights r for more freedom, lefts r for more regulation"?
The root of this semantic controversy is not Soviet commies as many libertarian socialists think the root is much deeper.
Semantic catastrophe of left movement began from Marx.
Marx and his followers made two bad things (actually they made more but these two r most important now):
1) they artificially narrowed left movement to working class so all other social groups were actually thrown outside the left movement.
2) they too much focused their attention on economic questions, narrowed human activity by economics.
And it lead to the following bad things:
1) many people of left practice but those who r against Marxism in order to distinguish themselves from Marxists don't call themselves leftists. having learned it we r to be careful and don't pay much attention to name of certain groups cause names can be emotional random and illogical but we r to pay attention to practice of certain group (for instance Conservatives of Canada r supposed to be right but actually they r a kind of libertarian socialists).
2) As far as Marx's main point was economics people accepted this idea and usually use economics as base of classification of different types of politic systems ignoring other aspects of life and ignoring original general idea of left movement: more freedom in all aspects not just in economics.
As I said above economic freedom and political freedom r related but they don't correlate directly and immediately: there could be societies with much economic freedoms and little politic freedom: Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, Spain of Franco, Chili of Pinochet, South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong.
A libertarian being asked of an ideal type of society would most probably tell us about completely free market. But market without any restriction of non economic nature will obligatory converse into an oligarchy: what will keep big corporation from destroying small firms? What will keep managements of big corporations from set up their own state their own dictatorship? Who will make corporation support fundamental science?
Actually libertarians r just another kind of bolschevik or commies.
And Marxism and related movements obviously ain't left cause dictatorship can't be combined with left practice. This is general objection against Marxism. Society is a layers cake, it can't consist of solely class and the more caless the more groups there r in a certain society the less abrasive it is.
Marxists state that they gonna create a completely just society where all needs of all people will be provided but immediately started to restrict human needs cause different people have different desires and it is impossible to provide all in the condition of plan economics but as far as they want to build a just society they r to provide all needs so it is much more simple to restrict desires, to state that certain desires r illegal, r unjust: u could not have ur own plane or ur own island ur even could not have ur own bike or net-book cause it's illegal desire... finally they come to the state where only the very basic needs r allowed. But restriction of human desire is impossible without serious oppression of freedom; that's why actually all Marxists projects always end like Polpotism.
From a point of view of a certain human being it doesn't matter who and for which goal concretely oppress people: nazi for pure race, commi for their communism or religious conservators - all they r just different types of right wing scum.
And that's why true leftist r anti-marxist leftist.
登録:
投稿 (Atom)