今が、今が！～来ているよ！ しんねんおめでとうございまああす～！ おしやわせに、みなさん。
2013年12月30日月曜日
2013年12月10日火曜日
2013年11月13日水曜日
how I was ejected Aloha Beach club DJs
yesterday I was to DJ pon Aloha Beach, as far as previous week I didn't spin I thought I am to DJ at 6 am SLT while actually I am at 5 am. so I was about 30 mins late. well, I spinned my set despite of connexion troubles. immediately after the end of spinning I got to log off so i had no time to change group tag and can u imagine my wonder when I log in and found that I ain't DJ of Aloha Beach anymore. lol.
I spoke to ikapono.catnap the owner of Aloha Beach and asked her if she is serious, i.e. is she going to eject me who spent more than a year pon the club just cause one case? ika chan offered me to take time out for a while. LOL. and I told her that if I go I go and never come back cause I ain't a plain staff which can be ejected and then can becalled again.
u probably wanna some moral? there is no moral pon this story. it's just a story of real life which is continued by SL I mean SL is continuation of RL actually. it is good that case like this happened in SL actually but not in RL.
I spoke to ikapono.catnap the owner of Aloha Beach and asked her if she is serious, i.e. is she going to eject me who spent more than a year pon the club just cause one case? ika chan offered me to take time out for a while. LOL. and I told her that if I go I go and never come back cause I ain't a plain staff which can be ejected and then can becalled again.
u probably wanna some moral? there is no moral pon this story. it's just a story of real life which is continued by SL I mean SL is continuation of RL actually. it is good that case like this happened in SL actually but not in RL.
2013年11月1日金曜日
some general notes on left wing and right wing
I was DJing pon Java beach club and we discussed just founded Kogyaru Riot and its idea and step by step conversation turned to the discussion of left and right ideas and differences between them.
Actually I have never thought that people's mind could be so tangled. when a guy told me "communism, fascism = left wing" I tried to explain him that it's a completely wrong view cause it contradicts to basic definitions but he didn't paid attention to my explanation and continued to repeat his mantra: marxists and fascist r leftists, leftists r against freedom. LOL!!! At that moment I decided to write something on true meaning of left and right.
Well, first I am to note that any good useful definition should envelop in same direction as etymology of a described phenomenon, should reflect the etymology, should count etymology, should take into consideration the origin of described phenomenon.
In the case of left wing and right wing we should turn to their root to French Revolution epoch when these two political trends appeared first. Leftists were supporters of changes (i.e. supporters of much freedom for individuals) while rightists were supporter of status quo (i.e. against positive changes).
And thus we can see that leftists are those who r for more freedoms (different freedoms, because there r no economic freedoms without so called politic freedoms and vice versa).
Leftists r against oppression of a human by any groups. And leftists r suspicious of any state.
This is the definition of true left as it was from the very beginning.
Right wing on contrary is against many individual freedoms but instead of it provides very interesting freedom: freedom from responsibility. Rightists think a human is a human and has a certain value as far as he/she is a member of certain group or a corpo.
Drainage divide between two trends is their view on state and relationship between state and a certain human being: leftists r suspicious of any state while right wing tend to worships state and state alike structures.
Of course both trend consist of very different movements but their general difference is their point of view on state and group/corpo oppression of individual freedom.
But stop how it could be that many people of different countries state the following: "rights r for more freedom, lefts r for more regulation"?
The root of this semantic controversy is not Soviet commies as many libertarian socialists think the root is much deeper.
Semantic catastrophe of left movement began from Marx.
Marx and his followers made two bad things (actually they made more but these two r most important now):
1) they artificially narrowed left movement to working class so all other social groups were actually thrown outside the left movement.
2) they too much focused their attention on economic questions, narrowed human activity by economics.
And it lead to the following bad things:
1) many people of left practice but those who r against Marxism in order to distinguish themselves from Marxists don't call themselves leftists. having learned it we r to be careful and don't pay much attention to name of certain groups cause names can be emotional random and illogical but we r to pay attention to practice of certain group (for instance Conservatives of Canada r supposed to be right but actually they r a kind of libertarian socialists).
2) As far as Marx's main point was economics people accepted this idea and usually use economics as base of classification of different types of politic systems ignoring other aspects of life and ignoring original general idea of left movement: more freedom in all aspects not just in economics.
As I said above economic freedom and political freedom r related but they don't correlate directly and immediately: there could be societies with much economic freedoms and little politic freedom: Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, Spain of Franco, Chili of Pinochet, South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong.
A libertarian being asked of an ideal type of society would most probably tell us about completely free market. But market without any restriction of non economic nature will obligatory converse into an oligarchy: what will keep big corporation from destroying small firms? What will keep managements of big corporations from set up their own state their own dictatorship? Who will make corporation support fundamental science?
Actually libertarians r just another kind of bolschevik or commies.
And Marxism and related movements obviously ain't left cause dictatorship can't be combined with left practice. This is general objection against Marxism. Society is a layers cake, it can't consist of solely class and the more caless the more groups there r in a certain society the less abrasive it is.
Marxists state that they gonna create a completely just society where all needs of all people will be provided but immediately started to restrict human needs cause different people have different desires and it is impossible to provide all in the condition of plan economics but as far as they want to build a just society they r to provide all needs so it is much more simple to restrict desires, to state that certain desires r illegal, r unjust: u could not have ur own plane or ur own island ur even could not have ur own bike or net-book cause it's illegal desire... finally they come to the state where only the very basic needs r allowed. But restriction of human desire is impossible without serious oppression of freedom; that's why actually all Marxists projects always end like Polpotism.
From a point of view of a certain human being it doesn't matter who and for which goal concretely oppress people: nazi for pure race, commi for their communism or religious conservators - all they r just different types of right wing scum.
And that's why true leftist r anti-marxist leftist.
Actually I have never thought that people's mind could be so tangled. when a guy told me "communism, fascism = left wing" I tried to explain him that it's a completely wrong view cause it contradicts to basic definitions but he didn't paid attention to my explanation and continued to repeat his mantra: marxists and fascist r leftists, leftists r against freedom. LOL!!! At that moment I decided to write something on true meaning of left and right.
Well, first I am to note that any good useful definition should envelop in same direction as etymology of a described phenomenon, should reflect the etymology, should count etymology, should take into consideration the origin of described phenomenon.
In the case of left wing and right wing we should turn to their root to French Revolution epoch when these two political trends appeared first. Leftists were supporters of changes (i.e. supporters of much freedom for individuals) while rightists were supporter of status quo (i.e. against positive changes).
And thus we can see that leftists are those who r for more freedoms (different freedoms, because there r no economic freedoms without so called politic freedoms and vice versa).
Leftists r against oppression of a human by any groups. And leftists r suspicious of any state.
This is the definition of true left as it was from the very beginning.
Right wing on contrary is against many individual freedoms but instead of it provides very interesting freedom: freedom from responsibility. Rightists think a human is a human and has a certain value as far as he/she is a member of certain group or a corpo.
Drainage divide between two trends is their view on state and relationship between state and a certain human being: leftists r suspicious of any state while right wing tend to worships state and state alike structures.
Of course both trend consist of very different movements but their general difference is their point of view on state and group/corpo oppression of individual freedom.
But stop how it could be that many people of different countries state the following: "rights r for more freedom, lefts r for more regulation"?
The root of this semantic controversy is not Soviet commies as many libertarian socialists think the root is much deeper.
Semantic catastrophe of left movement began from Marx.
Marx and his followers made two bad things (actually they made more but these two r most important now):
1) they artificially narrowed left movement to working class so all other social groups were actually thrown outside the left movement.
2) they too much focused their attention on economic questions, narrowed human activity by economics.
And it lead to the following bad things:
1) many people of left practice but those who r against Marxism in order to distinguish themselves from Marxists don't call themselves leftists. having learned it we r to be careful and don't pay much attention to name of certain groups cause names can be emotional random and illogical but we r to pay attention to practice of certain group (for instance Conservatives of Canada r supposed to be right but actually they r a kind of libertarian socialists).
2) As far as Marx's main point was economics people accepted this idea and usually use economics as base of classification of different types of politic systems ignoring other aspects of life and ignoring original general idea of left movement: more freedom in all aspects not just in economics.
As I said above economic freedom and political freedom r related but they don't correlate directly and immediately: there could be societies with much economic freedoms and little politic freedom: Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, Spain of Franco, Chili of Pinochet, South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong.
A libertarian being asked of an ideal type of society would most probably tell us about completely free market. But market without any restriction of non economic nature will obligatory converse into an oligarchy: what will keep big corporation from destroying small firms? What will keep managements of big corporations from set up their own state their own dictatorship? Who will make corporation support fundamental science?
Actually libertarians r just another kind of bolschevik or commies.
And Marxism and related movements obviously ain't left cause dictatorship can't be combined with left practice. This is general objection against Marxism. Society is a layers cake, it can't consist of solely class and the more caless the more groups there r in a certain society the less abrasive it is.
Marxists state that they gonna create a completely just society where all needs of all people will be provided but immediately started to restrict human needs cause different people have different desires and it is impossible to provide all in the condition of plan economics but as far as they want to build a just society they r to provide all needs so it is much more simple to restrict desires, to state that certain desires r illegal, r unjust: u could not have ur own plane or ur own island ur even could not have ur own bike or net-book cause it's illegal desire... finally they come to the state where only the very basic needs r allowed. But restriction of human desire is impossible without serious oppression of freedom; that's why actually all Marxists projects always end like Polpotism.
From a point of view of a certain human being it doesn't matter who and for which goal concretely oppress people: nazi for pure race, commi for their communism or religious conservators - all they r just different types of right wing scum.
And that's why true leftist r anti-marxist leftist.
2013年10月30日水曜日
Kogyaru Riot
Kogyaru Riot
this group is devoted to the struggle of kogyaru against discrimination by outfit in Second Life
we can wear sailor fuku anywhere!
we can wear lolita outfit anywhere!
let's stop pedo-hysteria set by conservative right wing protestant scum!
let's stop it together!
report here of all cases of outfit discrimination.
コギャルライオット
私たちは何処でもロリータのアウトフィットが着られる！
右派の保守的な新教徒の滓に作られた小児性愛のヒステリーを止まろう！
we can wear lolita outfit anywhere!
let's stop pedo-hysteria set by conservative right wing protestant scum!
let's stop it together!
report here of all cases of outfit discrimination.
コギャルライオット
これはＳｅｃｏｎｄ Ｌｉｆｅでの服によって差別に対するコギャルのグループです。
私たちは何処でもセーラー服が着られる！ 私たちは何処でもロリータのアウトフィットが着られる！
右派の保守的な新教徒の滓に作られた小児性愛のヒステリーを止まろう！
一緒に止まろう！
あらゆる事態をここにリポートしてください！
tresi_nonno@hotmail.com
in Second Life: Pimiko Resident
a case of paedo-hysteria pon Tempura island. tempura offi r against sailor fuku!
today I came to Tempura island wearing this outfit:
but suddenly I was ejected by an offi twice or trice without any explanation.
wtf???
then I finally got some explanation:
it was cause of my schoolgirl outfit
here u can see a furry child (many thanx to Riru Juwell for that link)
wtf???
then I finally got some explanation:
it was cause of my schoolgirl outfit
00:56]
CHIKAE チカ魔女 (chikae.ella): (Saved Wed 30 Oct 2013 11:55:33) Takashi
thou knew the rules now. Please follow the rules. Lady you should change
the school uniform. This rule now it is to be applied to other avatars
rule
14th of TEMPURA: Tempura Not allow use of baby-avatar, child-avatar.
Please change your avatar in adults. Adults will be allowed.
well,
but I don't think I look childish, cause pon SL they usually define
child not by wearing but by height and se:ra fuku doesn't obligatory
means child, it can be just cosplay.
well, but let's take a look around. do the Tempura offi use this rule fair? sure nope:
is it against rule #14? I think it is! but it's OK.
actually, it's also should be noted that they can't clearly border child avatar from adult avatar while all prohibitive rules must be clear enough and fair enough.
actually, it's also should be noted that they can't clearly border child avatar from adult avatar while all prohibitive rules must be clear enough and fair enough.
well, and most amazing that I happen pon a Japanese sim. just imagine: J A P A N E S E !
Japan
has never had any problems with pedo-hysteria and it's just influence
of right winged conservative and very christian scum of USA. I wonder
Japanese r so much in cargo cults. I have never met it in RL.
well, we all, normal people should fight against this conservative trend which poisons our life.
everybody
who want to participate should do the following: get a Japanese
schoolgirl outfit, wear it and go pon Tempura island. if it would be a
mass schoolgirl attack it would have some influence.
2013年10月20日日曜日
Jomon museum in Second Life
.png)
yesterday 19th October 2013 was set museum of Jomon culture in Second Life.
right now there r represented reconstructions of Jomon houses and some samples of pottery (all items can be bought).
also parcel can can be used as space for lectures, seminars and other related events.
2013年10月16日水曜日
2013年10月14日月曜日
Coming events: Jomon - Yayoi seminar beginning
Introduction into research of Jomon and general outline of the period
15.10.2013pon Little Yoshiwara sim
2013年10月4日金曜日
2013年10月1日火曜日
Coming events: last lecture of course on Root Shinto
lecture on magatama, shamans, images of nature universe, moral principles and so on
08.10.2013
6 am SLT
pon Little Yoshiwara sim
08.10.2013
6 am SLT
pon Little Yoshiwara sim
inaw pictures
Ainu niinoho inaw (a) from Sakhalin, kokeshi from Iwate (b), kokeshi from Miyagi (c)
map of spread of kokeshi-ningyo
2013年9月26日木曜日
coming events: lecture on nawa and magatama
coming events:
Tresi Nonno seminar on Root Shinto
lecture on nawa and magatama as basic tools of connexion with kami
nawa:
magatama:
01.10.2013 Tuesday at 6 am SLT
pon Little Yoshiwara sim
Tresi Nonno seminar on Root Shinto
lecture on nawa and magatama as basic tools of connexion with kami
nawa:
magatama:
01.10.2013 Tuesday at 6 am SLT
pon Little Yoshiwara sim
2013年9月17日火曜日
coming events
coming events:
lecture on basic concepts of Root Shinto: tram-ʔat and kam-ʔw-ʔy
24.09.2013 Tuesday at 6 am SLT
pon Little Yoshiwara sim
lecture on basic concepts of Root Shinto: tram-ʔat and kam-ʔw-ʔy
24.09.2013 Tuesday at 6 am SLT
pon Little Yoshiwara sim
2013年9月16日月曜日
Lectures on Root Shinto in Second Life
I am going to give a course of lectures on Root Shinto in Second Life
first lecture
"Introduction into the consideration of root Shinto: some notes on terms"
will take place on 17.09.2013 at 6 a.m. SLT
pon Little Yoshiwara sim
2013年5月23日木曜日
2013年5月4日土曜日
2013年3月19日火曜日
paikar 15013
トゥレシノンノ
Paikar rera tap oricinar miksu 15012
Paikar rera dub original mix 2013
パイカラレラダブ オリジナルミックス 二千十三
Tam miksu anak Aynu purihi asir pa iway okari humi ne.
'Paikar' a-ye itak 'asir pa toyko ki' ne. Paikar anak Aynu purihi pa etok ne. Hemanta kus ne no a-ram easkay? Oyak sir rehe (sak, sitcuk, mata) or ta 'pa' a-ye sinrit isam kus nerok sir or ta asir pa iway isam a-ram easkay. Or wa, hempara ta tam iway an nankor? Hemanta to ta an nankor? Aynu utar anak teeta wa no Matnaw hemisuhere ta oka. Tap ne kus inkar=an ro: hemanta to iyotta pase iyotta nucaktek paikar to an ya? Matnaw hemisuhere ta iyotta pase paikar to anak paikar ekuinokkusu to ne (sirpeker tanne-hi anak sirkunne tanne-hi tura uneno-an pe ne). Tampe kus Aynu purihi asir pa iway nea to ta an nankor a-ram easkay.
Tam paikar anak hap rap cup iye 20 to 11:02 AM an.
Paikar rera means 'wind of spring' or 'wind of new year feast' in Ainu.
Ainu word for spring word for 'spring', paikar/paykar, consists if the following morhemes: pa - 'year', i - 'to do something intensively', kar - 'to do something in order to get some result'. It means that traditional Ainu new year feast most probably was in spring. but when in spring? as far as Ainu laways have lived in Northern hemisphere and the most notable spring day of Northern hemisphere is Vernal equinox so it can be supposed that paikar feast took place on the day of Vernal equinox.
This year paikar is March 20 11:02 AM
パイカララはアイヌ語の「春の風」それとも「新年祭りの風」の言葉です。
アイヌ語のpaikar｢パイカラ｣「春」の言葉はpa「年」,i「集約」,kar「作る」の形態素から成り立つ。何の意味するか？アイヌは伝統の新年祭りが春に行えた。アイヌは普通北半球に住んでいたので、北半球には春の一番目ぼしいの日は春分点で、paikarの日付は春分点であろう。今年のpaikarは三月二十日１１:０２AM来る。
登録:
投稿 (Atom)